A dynamic binaural harmonic-cancellation model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker varying in intonation, temporal envelope, and location.

The aim of this study was to extend the harmonic-cancellation model proposed by Prud'homme et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 148 (2020) 3246--3254] to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker, so that it takes into account binaural hearing, amplitude modulations in the masker and variations in masker fundamental frequency (F0) over time. This was done by segmenting the masker signal into time frames and combining the previous long-term harmonic-cancellation model with the binaural model proposed by Vicente and Lavandier [Hear. Res. 390 (2020) 107937]. The new model was tested on the data from two experiments involving harmonic complex maskers that varied in spatial location, temporal envelope and F0 contour. The interactions between the associated effects were accounted for in the model by varying the time frame duration and excluding the binaural unmasking computation when harmonic cancellation is active. Across both experiments, the correlation between data and model predictions was over 0.96, and the mean and largest absolute prediction errors were lower than 0.6 and 1.5 dB, respectively.

Investigating the role of harmonic cancellation in speech-on-speech masking.

This study investigated the role of harmonic cancellation in the intelligibility of speech in "cocktail party" situations. While there is evidence that harmonic cancellation plays a role in the segregation of simple harmonic sounds based on fundamental frequency (F0), its utility for mixtures of speech containing non-stationary F0s and unvoiced segments is unclear. Here we focused on the energetic masking of speech targets caused by competing speech maskers. Speech reception thresholds were measured using seven maskers: speech-shaped noise, monotonized and intonated harmonic complexes, monotonized speech, noise-vocoded speech, reversed speech and natural speech. These maskers enabled an estimate of how the masking potential of speech is influenced by harmonic structure, amplitude modulation and variations in F0 over time. Measured speech reception thresholds were compared to the predictions of two computational models, with and without a harmonic cancellation component. Overall, the results suggest a minor role of harmonic cancellation in reducing energetic masking in speech mixtures.

A harmonic-cancellation-based model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker.

This work aims to predict speech intelligibility against harmonic maskers. Unlike noise maskers, harmonic maskers (including speech) have a harmonic structure that may allow for a release from masking based on fundamental frequency (F0). Mechanisms, such as spectral glimpsing and harmonic cancellation, have been proposed to explain F0 segregation, but their relative contributions and ability to predict behavioral data have not been explored. A speech intelligibility model was developed that includes both spectral glimpsing and harmonic cancellation. The model was used to fit the data of two experiments from Deroche, Culling, Chatterjee, and Limb [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135, 2873-2884 (2014)], in which speech reception thresholds were measured for stationary harmonic maskers varying in their F0 and degree of harmonicity. Key model parameters (jitter in the masker F0, shape of the cancellation filter, frequency limit for cancellation, and signal-to-noise ratio ceiling) were optimized by maximizing the correspondence between the predictions and data. The model was able to accurately describe the effects associated with varying the masker F0 and harmonicity. Across both experiments, the correlation between data and predictions was 0.99, and the mean and largest absolute prediction errors were lower than 0.5 and 1 dB, respectively.

Do we need two ears to perceive the distance of a virtual frontal sound source?

The present study investigated whether the perception of virtual auditory distance is binaural, monaural, or both. Listeners evaluated the distance of a frontal source of pink noise simulated in a room via headphones. Experiment 1 was performed with eyes closed in a soundproof booth. Experiment 2 was performed with eyes open in the room used to create the stimuli. Individualized and non-individualized stimuli were compared. Different conditions for controlling sound level were tested. The amount of binaural information in the stimuli was varied by mixing the left and right ear signals in different proportions. Results showed that the use of non-individualized stimuli did not impair distance perception. Binaural information was not used by naive listeners to evaluate distance, both with and without visual information available. However, for some listeners, a complete absence of binaural information could disrupt distance evaluation with headphones. Sound level was a dominant cue used by listeners to judge for distance, and some listeners could also reliably use reverberation-related changes in spectral content. In the absence of specific training, artificial manipulation of sound level greatly altered distance judgments.